IN OUR VIEW: Public personnel is a public concern
2 years ago | 1074 views | 1 1 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Surprise rippled through the community this week as Mid-Carolina High baseball coach Clyde Livingston was put on administrative leave. Surprise rippled, but no official explanation was forthcoming. Then yesterday, Livingston resigned. But the school district would be doing the community a disservice if his resignation is the last we hear of this matter.

Although it is indeed a “personnel matter” as the district says, the personnel in question was, in essence, a public employee paid by the taxpayers.

It should be a public matter. South Carolina’s Freedom of Information law provides secrecy protection for government employers in matters of personnel. However, it is left up to the employers, the people “in the know” to determine when that veil of secrecy is to be pulled. If that protection is consistently used as a blanket to hide all administrative actions involving personnel, the spirit of the law is not being served, and neither is the public.

Comments
(1)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
mykidsmom
|
April 10, 2009
Based on the 'buzz' around this 'personal matter,' I believe the information should be revealed - actually, there appears to be a history of misconduct. As a teacher and coach in such close contact with students, his conduct is a matter of public concern and trust. A breach of that trust should be reported.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: